Support Marriage Equality

In (less than) 50 days, 4 states will vote on marriage equality.

With enough of us talking about marriage, sharing, tweeting and donating – we can drive people out to vote on November 6 and deliver marriage equality in 3 states while fighting off a total ban in another.

We can make history by winning marriage equality ballot initiatives in Maine, Maryland and Washington State. In Minnesota the fight is a different one – we’ll be stopping a total ban on same-sex marriage.

Grab any of the photos below and Share/Post/Blog/Tweet/Like/Pin/Text/Email.  Then re-Share/re-Post/re-Blog/re-Like/re-Pin/re-Text/re-Email.  Put them anywhere and everywhere you can.

Get involved with Mainers United for Marriage, Marylanders for Marriage Equality, Minnesotans United for All Families and Washington United for Marriage.

Get daily content to post on your social media at TheFour.com.  Every day, The FOUR will be putting out a new piece of interesting content from a celebrity or artist – if you like it, all you need to do is share it.

Anti-gay and anti-human rights organizations in our country are mobilizing – putting vast sums of money and resources into all four states to defeat us. In the past, despite great polls – we have lost ballot initiatives. Our opposition is organized and well-funded. But we have what they don’t – we’re fighting for love, not against it.

20120920-112727.jpg

20120920-112742.jpg

20120920-112801.jpg

20120920-112814.jpg

20120920-112829.jpg

Weekly Photo Challenge: Summer

Two photos immediately came to mind after reading this week’s challenge.

The first was of Dino and Paco on the deck at the lake cabin enjoying a popsicle on a hot summer day. They had been running around like maniacs and when I showed them the cold popsicle, the tore into it.

20120525-111540.jpg

The second is a photo of the Sunset Beach Grocery, a little store on the way out to the cabin.

My Summer Requirements

I want sunshine that squints my eyes and pinks my neck,

Rickety tilt-a-whirls and snow cones that turn my lips and tongue blue.

I want impromptu late-night bike rides,

Skinny dipping, bonfires, and outdoor movies.

I want new and creative ways to “beat the heat.”

Grocery stores, movie theaters, and park fountains.

I want pranks and laughter, love and kissing,

Hand holding, but mostly, I want you.


Friends – The Urban Etiquette Handbook – Self Help

When can you send a thank-you via e-mail?

A mass e-mail is actually preferable when thanking people who combined to put together a work project or totally rockin’ party, as it emphasizes the communal nature of the achievement and offers the opportunity for public praise. Everything else (e.g., weddings, gifts, anniversaries, job promotions or interviews, etc.) still goes on nice, high-fiber stationery or a store-bought card.

How do you handle it when you, in full party panic, can’t remember the name of someone you know?

Blame the panic! In fact, don’t just blame the panic, inflate it. Begin talking about how flustered you are: You thought it was Thursday for a second, you put your drink down five minutes ago and can’t find it, you are so out of it that you’ve forgotten the name . . . of someone across the room whose name, in reality, you do remember! Then, conspiratorially ask the person whose name you can’t recall to introduce herself to the third party—as you laugh all the way to the First National Bank of Knowing Everybody’s Name.

How do you bring up the subject of a friend’s serious medical problem?

The simple answer is, you don’t. If someone has a medical condition that’s serious but not visually detectable, and he hasn’t broached the subject with you, chances are it’s because he doesn’t want it broached at all. People have all sorts of legitimate reasons for wanting to keep health issues private. You can let your friend know you’re concerned—without embarrassing him—with an earnest gaze and a sincere “So, how are you doing?” which communicates empathy without raising the subject out loud if he really doesn’t feel like talking.

How do you acknowledge obvious plastic surgery?

If the intentions were subtle, pretend you don’t know exactly what change your friend has undergone, even if she looks like a convenience-store thief masked in Saran Wrap. Something like, “Oh, wow . . . you look great. I can’t put my finger on what’s different, but you look years younger.” If the operation was done expressly to garner attention—say the former B-cup is now a DD with the top three buttons undone—well, then just let it rip: “Wow! Those hooters are like big twin Hindenburgs!”

What’s the best response to a racist remark at a dinner party

Nervous laughter is the inevitable reflex. But the failure to respond will certainly add to your hangover, no matter how much gin has been consumed. The first line of defense against bigotry is to assume that it’s a joke, and say so. “You must be joking . . . though it’s not really that funny.” Try to smile as little as possible while holding out the possibility of forgiveness. You could also accuse the person of being drunk, which is almost always the case. But if someone is offering an entire line of argument that is clearly bigoted or otherwise beyond the bounds of civilized discourse (“I don’t want them in my neighborhood”), someone is honor-bound to make an Atticus Finch–like declaration of belief.

Should the wealthier half of a friendship be expected to give more-expensive gifts?

In an ideal world, no. But in the real world, yeah, pretty much. A rule of thumb: Give according to your means, not the recipient’s. If you’re the richer friend, your impoverished friends will appreciate your generosity infinitely more than a cheap trinket you purchased so as not to embarrass them. If you’re the poorer friend—and you’re worried about being outclassed—get together with other friends of lesser means to pool resources on an item of greater value. Better still, spend extra effort on a thoughtful but nevertheless affordable gift that shows you’ve actually paid attention to your friends’ most obscure tastes and interests.

What’s the best way to avoid awkward crossed-signals handshake-meets-cheek-kiss encounters? 

Remember: You can usually get away with unwarranted familiarity if your intended recipient sees it coming. Strike early:

• If you or the person you’re greeting is a woman, start telegraphing your intentions before you make eye contact, either extending your hand or opening your arms according to whim. (Under no circumstances should you give a woman a fist pound.)

• If it’s a masculine pairing, make eye contact and form your hand into the appropriate shake/fist pound/gangster-style-clasp shape before raising your arm. (And never give an elaborate handshake to the uninitiated.)

What do “I’ll call you” or “Let’s have lunch” mean?

In a non-dating situation, these hollow parting comments often translate roughly to “In all likelihood, I won’t call you” and “Let’s not have lunch, though I have generally positive feelings about you.” (Though the recipient has no choice but to be agreeable in the moment and assume the phone won’t ring.) If you’re prone to such phrases, consider deploying “It was good to see you,” which, while perfectly pleasant, won’t confuse anyone.

Can you reject a social networking friend request from someone you know? 

No. It’s not as though adding someone to your online social network costs anything: The only potential damage is to the perceived quality of your accumulated friends. And if you know someone who judges you based on your Friendster network, then, well, like Mom said, he’s not your real Internet friend anyway.

How do you end an exchange of witty, flirtatious e-mail banter?

The exchange of witty, flirtatious banter is admittedly the e-mail quagmire with the fewest number of obvious exit strategies. Nonetheless, it should be resolved like real-time witty, flirtatious banter: with one party either summoning the courage to ask for a date or ending the quasi relationship by means of unexplained unresponsiveness.

What do you do when you’ve attended a performance by your aspiring actor/singer/comic friend—and you were driven to tears by its utter banality? 

Always lie, but try to do it in ways that aren’t so liar-y. Gush about aspects of the show that weren’t horrid (“Such exquisite costuming!”), compliment the very particular elements of his performance that were adequate, or say something not-technically-false like “That’s exactly what we’ve come to expect from you!” Long-term encouragement of delusional artistic aspirations, though, is impolite: If the invites are repeated, let your nonattendance send a message.

If you accept a dinner invitation and have a miserable time, must you reciprocate? 

If someone treats you to dinner at a restaurant or in their home, you owe them the same honor. But if you really can’t stand the inviting individual/couple, a good compromise is to invite them to your next big party. This sends the message that you are thinking about them while minimizing the probability of actual contact.

How far are you obligated to go to accommodate vegetarians and vegans in your home?

If it’s a dinner party, you should have at least one option for each course that suits everyone’s dietary needs, though restricted eaters have the responsibility of letting you know what they can and can’t eat. If you’re the guest, you should politely inform the host of your regimen by way of offering to bring a dish that suits your needs that everyone will “enjoy.” (The less appetizing it sounds—e.g., seaweed dogs—the more likely your horrified host will come up with something better.)

How do you pick restaurants and other social activities in circles that involve widely varying incomes?

Inviting the whole gang over for dinner solves some problems—the poor people won’t have to choose between missing a credit card payment or being treated, and the richer folk get a nice meal if you’re a generally decent cook. Of course, it creates an altogether new problem: In your sensitivity to everyone’s income issues, you alone wind up underwriting the entire evening. That’s fine some of the time, but for another alternative, choose an under-the-radar, inexpensive restaurant where everyone will feel cutting-edge— self-congratulatory hipsterdom knows no class boundaries.

What’s the best way to split the check in a group?

At a group meal, an equal split should be the baseline expectation: It falls to those who ordered more-expensive dishes to offer to pay more, not to others to pay less. Failure to partake in the appetizers or the wine can be cited as a reason to cut one’s contribution only if there was some socially sanctioned reason for declining (veganism, Islam, pregnancy). If you just got the soup and you don’t think that’s fair, well, think about whether it’s “fair” to make your friends eat dinner with a buzz-killing cheapskate.

WHEN IS IT ACCEPTABLE TO TEXT DURING A CONVERSATION?

When it’s a “conversation” in the sense of “The New School Presents a Conversation With Harold Bloom” and you’re there. Otherwise, never. This remains one of society’s most frequent breaches of basic human decency. Seriously, what is wrong with those people?!?

HOW DO YOU TELL SOMEONE HE’S BEEN MISPRONOUNCING YOUR NAME FOR THREE MONTHS?

Tell him a story in which you use your own name, clearly enunciating where he’s got it wrong. For example, if you were Ralph Fiennes, you’d say, “I called him and said, ‘Hi, this is Raaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaafe Fines.’ ”

IS IT EVER OKAY TO DRIVE A HUMMER?

Yes! If you’re leading a nighttime raid in Tikrit. Otherwise, Hummers have returned to their rightful place as a semi-obnoxious, semi-absurd rarity. Accepting a ride is different: In New York, being a passenger in any vehicle, matter how gauche or fuel-inefficient, is a rare treat.

via The Urban Etiquette Handbook — New York Magazine.

Rules for Using the ‘Reply All’ Button – Self Help

Rules for Using the ‘Reply All’ Button

An email with a long list of recipients can be an easy way to accomplish tasks by electronic committee. It can also be an infuriating way to gum up your inbox for days. Let’s set some ground rules.

Although it is much maligned, the mass email can be a great way to disseminate information to a large group of people at once. This comes in especially handy when inviting people to a party, changing your address or phone number, or letting everyone on staff know when they can start taking summer Fridays (please, God, can we get that email?). It can also be helpful for group discussions when you’re working on a project with several co-workers at once, especially when some of them aren’t in the same office and physical meetings are impossible.

The problem isn’t the “reply all” button, of course. It’s the fcuktards who are far too quick to use it to let everyone on a given list know how hung over they are this morning, that Mary Jane in accounting does not wash her hands after using the bathroom, or that they “LOLed. Thanx ~~BYE!!~~” It’s enough to make you want to quit computers altogether and go back to drafting your correspondence with quills.

We don’t need to go that far. But we can drastically improve interoffice and interpersonal communications if everyone can agree to just a few simple guidelines.

Take a Minute and Evaluate: Before you hit “reply all” take a minute and ask yourself, “Does everyone need to read this?” The answer is pretty much always no. Sometimes all it takes is a split second for you to realize, “No one cares what I have to say on this topic, so I will keep it to myself.” Please click “discard draft” instead. This is especially true when the original mass email is one that’s intended to distribute information. If you get a message that the office will be closed on Saturday or the third-floor bathroom is closed for repairs, just read it, do what you want with the information, and then shut the fuck up. No one cares what you think about it, or whether this will make your life better or worse, so your two cents on the matter are entirely irrelevant.

Answer the Question: After a brief evaluation, sometimes the answer is, “Yes, I should reply to all,” especially if the email is asking a question. A friend sends out a missive that asks, “What should we do tonight, guys?” You should probably respond, but only respond by answering the question. In this instance, proper responses might include “let’s drink our faces off at [insert your favorite bar]” or “Shelly and I have to go to her stupid parents’ house, but I heard there’s a good concert at [insert place].” Those are good, solid, productive answers. If you waste space in our inbox by replying, “Hmmm…Good question,” or “I don’t know, I’m so lame now that I have a baby,” we are going to have to reach through the internet and punch you.

Keep the In-Jokes to Yourself: The great thing about mass emails is that you can communicate with a great number of people all at once. The problem is that there’s always that insecure asshole who feels the need to show just how close to you he or she is to the person who sent the email so he responds to everyone, “Just like that donkey that was wearing socks that we saw on the way to Mobile. AMIRITE!” We do not find this amusing. We don’t know you or get your jokes, and now if and when we finally do meet you—we do have mutual friends, after all—we are going to think that you’re an annoying jackass with bad taste in travel destinations.

Don’t Just Say Thank You: If your thoughtful coworker emails the office and says, “Hey everyone, I tried out my new recipe for Lemon Bars last night and brought them for you to enjoy. They’re on the table in the kitchen, help yourself,” please don’t email everyone just to say, “Thanks!” or “Yummy!” or “You da bomb.” This is now a whole separate email in our inbox that includes just one word, or maybe two or three. We have to delete that email and that takes effort we’d rather spend cruising the sales on Gilt Groupe while pretending to actually work. You aren’t telling us anything we don’t know and you’re not adding anything to the conversation, so just cram another Lemon Bar into your piehole and keep quiet. If you want to express your appreciation to the Betty Crocker wannabe in the next cube, then go over and say, “Wow, those were really good. Thanks so much,” with your mouth and lips and real, out-loud words. This person slaved over a hot stove for you, the least you can do is say thank you like a real person.

Your Silence Is Your Assent: When it comes to group email discussions, Roberts Rules of Order apply. If someone starts an email saying, “We will be doing trust falls at the corporate retreat on Thursday.” The first person possible should say, “That is a stupid idea.” And then someone should quickly say, “I agree.” This is like nominating something for a vote and then seconding it. There is no need for everyone on the thread to say that’s dumb (which trust falls are), because those two people spoke for the masses. At that point, saying nothing is agreeing with the naysayers. But if, on the other hand, you happen to agree with the first person, pipe up, by all means. Once something has been nominated and seconded, the person who sent the original email must either restate his/her position (“The guys at HQ are forcing us”), or back down (“You’re right. Let’s all do shots instead.”). Just like in a real meeting, you don’t have to say “I agree” in response to every email that goes around. Everyone knows you’re monitoring the conversation. Only share when you have something definitive or constructive to say.

Err on the Side of Replying to One: If you want to say something but don’t know if it’s appropriate for the whole audience, reply to the original sender only. This is perfect for in-jokes, statements that don’t answer any questions, and monosyllabic assertions of agreement. Just tell the person who started the thread. That person emailed the group to share information and/or get input, so they won’t care. It’s the rest of the people on the list you have to worry about pissing off. If what you have to say is profound enough, then the originator will share it with the group. Leave it up to their discretion (which is already a bit questionable since they included so many oversharers on the initial email list).

Avoid the Passive Aggressive CC: Sometimes you send an email to one person and they respond by CCing their boss, assistant, best friend, ex-girlfriend, or some random person they met Saturday night at a bar. Suddenly you find yourself in the middle of a group email you never intended. This is especially bad if you don’t know the third party. The only way to retaliate is to never reply all during this conversation. Just respond to the person who you originally emailed. This is the electronic equivalent of being at a party talking to someone and they say, “Let me introduce you to my friend, Joe.” But you hate Joe, so you just keep your eyes locked on the original person hoping Joe will just get annoyed and go away. Over email it’s even easier, because the original person will have to CC Joe again and again, which should hopefully send the signal that you don’t want to communicate with stupid asshat Joe. If they don’t get the hint, never email this person again. Even if it’s your boss.

Take Preventative Measures: We really shouldn’t have to tell you what the “Blind CC” function on your email is, but based on the countless communications we’ve received that could have benefited from its use, there must be more idiots in the world than we previously imagined. If you put all the email addresses in this field, they will stay anonymous and immune from the “Reply All.” Explaining this is like having to tell a 30-year-old where babies come from, but you made it necessary. Please, in the future, use this or we’re going to start giving your email address to Russian porn spammers in retaliation.

Don’t Kiss Your Company On The Mouth

Yesterday, while I was riding up in the elevator at work, I thought of something. I am and pretty much have always been a rather stoic worker, I just do my job and try to do it the best I can, but do not expect any sort of acknowledgment. This is good because for the most part, the only time my work is noticed or pointed out is when something is wrong. I can do a hundred things a day for weeks and do them all right and it’s the one thing I do wrong that gets attention. I guess most employers are like that. I spend most of my day alone, working on various projects, and all the while daydreaming. So in the elevator, I had a daydream that I was having a conversation with a coworker (a fictional coworker, for some reason) and I mentioned that I never write about work on my blog. The “coworker” replied “You have a blog?” and I answered “Yes, I have a whole life that doesn’t involve here.” I got to thinking about it and I do. I do not write about work, I do not even think about work after I leave. There are daily frustrations that I “process out” on the treadmill at the gym each evening, but I do not carry anything with me into my life. Work is not my identity.

I know I learned that lesson the hard way at Amazon. I worked hard to help build that company and made moderate advances in my position, but as soon as I was not what they wanted anymore, they discarded me without a second thought. I remember someone there telling me shortly before I left: “Don’t ever love a company because it can never love you back.” I had loved Amazon. I had wanted the best for Amazon and put it’s success before mine. I stayed loyal to Amazon long after I should have.

Neiman Marcus tried to make us all into “Company Men” with their endless pep rally meetings, worthless awards, and insincere and generic compliments. After being over-looked for two promotions and getting a 15 cent an hour raise at my one year review, I knew that the people in charge were not going to see or use or recognize the potential I possessed. So, I left. Later, far too much later, the people in charge were fired for what I can only assume was absolute incompetence. Unless you can fire someone for being really really insincere?

The bottom line is when you start a job, you are given an identification number. You are a number to them. Nothing more. Do not let them be more than a number to you. The number they are to you appears on your paycheck. Just like prostitutes have rules about not kissing their clients on the lips because it is too intimate and too much of a conveyance of love, neither should you. Never kiss your company on the lips because it won’t kiss you back.